The issues are different. The narrative dynamics are not. Our work spans climate, democracy, and public health because the patterns that shape public attitudes cut across all three.
Across six European countries, opposition to climate policy has shifted from denying the science to validating real concerns and redirecting them toward the wrong culprit.
A two-part study across three countries mapped how everyday frustration, not ideology, draws young men rightward, then asked where other voices can still reach them.
Across five countries and six contested topics, the real driver of toxic polarisation was not how much people disagree, but where the disagreement is aimed.
A real grievance over Dutch nitrogen policy was captured online and rewritten into a global conspiracy, told mostly by people who were not Dutch.
A large ecosystem of young male creators is already selling other men on plant protein, on their own terms, and mostly without mentioning the climate.
Over eighteen months, Ripple Research built and led WHO Europe's standing capability to manage misleading information during health emergencies.
A single tracker turns scattered ministerial meeting records into one evidence base linking lobbying access to corporate positions on food-system reform.
Working with Digital Planet at Tufts, large-scale social listening became a real-time sensing function for policy and crisis management.
Most engagements start with a conversation about what you're trying to understand and what a useful answer would look like.
